Assisted reads as entry-level shadow work. Even when accurate, it under-signals your contribution. 50 stronger alternatives that name the specific support you provided.
Assisted is fine for genuinely junior roles, but even then, naming the specific support reads better than the generic verb.
Replace 'assisted' with the verb that names the specific support.
It signals junior contribution and does not name the specific support you provided. Even at the start of a career, naming whether you advised, enabled, coordinated, or contributed reads stronger.
Occasionally. Use it once at most. Replace the others with verbs that name the action: drafted, prepared, coordinated, supported a 4-person team.
It depends. 'Supported' for general help. 'Contributed' for work output. 'Co-led' when you genuinely shared leadership. 'Authored' for documents and frameworks. 'Coordinated' for cross-functional work.
Yes if you can name the specific action. Leave one if it accurately describes a shadow or training role.
Free CV scorer flags 'assisted'-heavy bullets.
Check my CV →